Can Already Smell the Butthurt in Psychology Class

So, I’m in Distance Learning for my Psychology course this semester with my fiance. One of the requirements for doing this online is to participate in the “discussion forum topic” each week. This is week one, and I’m already causing some shit, lol.

I’m going to post the screencaps of others, but this guy was giving his opinion on “Abstinence” classes and I responded. I commend him on his effort to project his defensiveness onto me as if I was the one offended … but it doesn’t quite work when it’s obvious that he is the one offended when blew past my whole argument to him, and he nitpicked ONE thing I said in response to someone else.


sweetlittlemoon: christiannightmares: Suspended Nova Scotia student defiantly wears ‘Life Is Wasted Without Jesus’ T-shirt (To read the story, visit National Post) Well it seems like the school was trying to handle it well. This kid seems like a douche. Wearing it a couple times in defiance still says something. His continuing just proves he’s an ass. He’s not proving any point except that he views his religious beliefs superior to other students. Fuck that noise. I read a few other articles on this story and I’m laughing at the people in the comments and even some of the authors. There’re a lot of people trying to claim that the school was out of line for suspending him and then threatening suspension for the rest of the school year, and that the students that complained about him were “obnoxious and self-righteous”. Those students were well within their right to complain about the fucking shirt. I would offended, too, and I can almost promise you that this smug little shit would have complained to the principle if an Atheist sank to his level and wore a t-shirt that said something like, “Life is Wasted If You DO Believe in Jesus”. Instead, they took it to the proper authority and the simple solution was to have him wear a different shirt. Clearly no one read the part where he was TOLD to put on a different shirt and he adamantly refused under his misguided belief that he was “protecting” his “freedom of speech”. These same people obviously didn’t read the other part where it he CONTINUED to wear this same shirt throughout the week despite the school’s orders, so every time he wore it, they punished him - 3-day I.S.S., 5-day A.S.S., and now suspension for the rest of the school year. The shirt was no longer the problem. Blatant disregard for authority OVER the fucking shirt was the problem. I don’t know about any of you fuckers, but when I was in school, our Dress Code disbanded shirts that displayed religious, non-religious, and political beliefs altogether. It also disbanded shirts that were just as offensive (cursing, sex, drugs, alcohol, violence, bigotry, hate speech, etc.). S’what happens when you go to a fucking public school. The school was well within their rights to suspend him for not doing as he was told. So, yes, I agree - this guy does seem like a douche.
Pop-upView Separately

sweetlittlemoon:

christiannightmares:

Suspended Nova Scotia student defiantly wears ‘Life Is Wasted Without Jesus’ T-shirt (To read the story, visit National Post)



Well it seems like the school was trying to handle it well. This kid seems like a douche. Wearing it a couple times in defiance still says something. His continuing just proves he’s an ass. He’s not proving any point except that he views his religious beliefs superior to other students. Fuck that noise.



I read a few other articles on this story and I’m laughing at the people in the comments and even some of the authors. There’re a lot of people trying to claim that the school was out of line for suspending him and then threatening suspension for the rest of the school year, and that the students that complained about him were “obnoxious and self-righteous”.

Those students were well within their right to complain about the fucking shirt. I would offended, too, and I can almost promise you that this smug little shit would have complained to the principle if an Atheist sank to his level and wore a t-shirt that said something like, “Life is Wasted If You DO Believe in Jesus”.

Instead, they took it to the proper authority and the simple solution was to have him wear a different shirt.

Clearly no one read the part where he was TOLD to put on a different shirt and he adamantly refused under his misguided belief that he was “protecting” his “freedom of speech”. These same people obviously didn’t read the other part where it he CONTINUED to wear this same shirt throughout the week despite the school’s orders, so every time he wore it, they punished him - 3-day I.S.S., 5-day A.S.S., and now suspension for the rest of the school year.

The shirt was no longer the problem. Blatant disregard for authority OVER the fucking shirt was the problem.

I don’t know about any of you fuckers, but when I was in school, our Dress Code disbanded shirts that displayed religious, non-religious, and political beliefs altogether. It also disbanded shirts that were just as offensive (cursing, sex, drugs, alcohol, violence, bigotry, hate speech, etc.).

S’what happens when you go to a fucking public school. The school was well within their rights to suspend him for not doing as he was told.

So, yes, I agree - this guy does seem like a douche.

Source: christiannightmares

Explaining The Shit That Santorum Said

If you’re not already aware, Rick Santorum, the psychotic Christian zealot and ex-senator from Pennsylvania, finally dropped out of the Republican primaries when he got less than a fourth of the votes in the Midwest states.

I currently want to grab some of his more infamous quotes and argue them because the horrible thing? Even after all of these things he said, he still started becoming a fucking threat in the polls against Mitt Romney, which means either people are seriously fuck-stupid to even comprehend the shit he says … or they’re voting for him because he’s against DAT DEM HOMO-SEXAL MURRAGES and TEH KILLIN OF BABBIES.

Let’s start:



“One of the things I will talk about, that no president has talked about before, is I think the dangers of contraception in this country…. Many of the Christian faith have said, well, that’s okay, contraception is okay. It’s not okay. It’s a license to do things in a sexual realm that is counter to how things are supposed to be.”


That’s right, folks. Santorum wants to BAN all contraception (along with abortion, but we’ll get to that later) because it ALLOWS men and women to have SEX for intentions OTHER than shitting out a child. OMG, THE FUCKING HORROR.

Not only that, but he is actually SAYING that there is only ONE “right” way to have sex with this “it goes against how things are supposed to be” bullshit.

“Supposed to be”? Who the fuck are you, Rick, to tell OTHER people what they should and shouldn’t do in the PRIVACY of their home if it’s not harming anyone?

So, not only does he want to ban gay marriage on a federal level (I will also get into this later), he is ACTUALLY implying that he would attempt to make it illegal to just BE gay, have some form of a fetish (whether it be practically common or extreme), or simply have sex other than for childbearing.



“In every society, the definition of marriage has not ever to my knowledge included homosexuality. That’s not to pick on homosexuality. It’s not, you know, man on child, man on dog, or whatever the case may be.”


In every society? To your knowledge? Well, because I know how to Google, “Countries that allow gay marriage”, I was able to come up with many reliable sites that say otherwise, Rick.

COUNTRIES WITH CURRENT LEGAL SAME-SEX MARRIAGE:
Argentina (2010)
Belgium (2003)
Canada (2005)
Iceland (2010)
Netherlands (2001)
Norway (2009)
Portugal (2010)
South Africa (2006)
Spain (2005)
Sweden (2009)

Rick, unless you live under a fucking rock, in the middle of the Amazonian rainforest, where you have no access to a computer, the Internet, or international news magazines, you were just caught in your BLATANT anti-gay propaganda.

Even more so, you can’t make excuses. You can’t claim that all of these countries legalized marriages the day before you started running for president (because, as you can see, the Netherlands’ law dates back to 2001), and you can’t rephrase that you meant that for CENTURIES, homosexual marriage was illegal because FOR CENTURIES, a lot of things were illegal that now ARE NOT illegal today (women’s rights and blacks rights are major ones).



“President Obama wants everybody in America to go to college. What a snob … Oh, I understand why he wants you to go to college. He wants to remake you in his image.”


Wait. Let me get this straight: President Obama is a SNOB … because he wants to give everyone the opportunity to an affordable, easily accessible, and life-changing college experience, whether they’re currently living in an dumpster or a granite castle? He is a SNOB … because he is encouraging the young and elderly to pursue a COLLEGE education in order to get a better paying job and/or to START new jobs, which is what this fucking economy needs? (Because we all know it is NOT the 1% that create jobs; students fresh out of the business and marketing majors are.)

I don’t know about you, Rick, but I am MORE than all right with Obama “remaking me in his image” because I would LOVE to have cheaper college tuition and loans. Not only that, you’re implying that being “remade” in the image of an educated man with profound speaking skills and a degree from Harvard Law is a fucking BAD thing, especially when this man wants to give EVERYONE the ability to be as educated and well-spoken as he, considering that only 3% of the ENTIRETY of the United State’s tax dollars goes to the education system, including public schools K-12 and government-funded colleges, while 80% of our tax dollars is funding our military and the wars we’re currently waging and are going to no doubt wage in the future.

If Obama wants to pour more money into the education system, then you need stay the fuck out of his way, Rick, especially when YOU have three degrees from three different universities (two more than Obama), you fucking hypocrite.



“I think the Democrats are actually worried he (Obama) may go to Indonesia and bow to more Muslims.”


Fucking what? I don’t even know what the hell he’s talking about here; I just know it’s fucking stupid. Can anyone tell me what he’s using in order to twist the words on it?



“[Gay marriage] is an issue just like 9-11… We didn’t decide we wanted to fight the war on terrorism because we wanted to. It was brought to us. And if not now, when? When the supreme courts in all the other states have succumbed to the Massachusetts version of the law?”


Gay Marriage … is like two planes flying into the World Trade Center buildings and murdering nearly 4,000 people. Lol.

And you’re right, Rick; we didn’t get to decide if we wanted to fight “the war on terrorism”. George Fucking W. Bush ILLEGALLY declared war on the Middle East, going directly AGAINST the decision of Congress, and he lied to the public that they had nuclear weapons in order to get the nation to back his ILLEGAL, UNCONSTITUTIONAL war … and in all of that, we then TOOK this illegally declared war … TO THE WRONG FUCKING COUNTRIES! When the smoke cleared, Afghanistan was still untouched in spite of the fact that Bush and the media KEPT saying that THAT was where they suspected Al-Qa’ida and Bin Laden were hiding.

And, Rick, I also find it quite hilarious that even though the States are exercising their CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT to make the laws they wish without the control of the federal government so long as their laws don’t violate said Constitution … you only seem have a problem with the States that have legalized same-sex marriage; NOT the states that have ALSO exercised their constitutional right when they deemed same-sex marriages ILLEGAL in THEIR territory. Hmm.



“Is anyone saying same-sex couples can’t love each other? I love my children. I love my friends, my brother. Heck, I even love my mother-in-law. Should we call these relationships marriage, too?”


Because platonic love is the same as romantic love, guys, therefore they can be compared! Lol. I guess I’m not romantically in love with my fiance, then. Or is Rick implying that homosexuals are incapable of feeling anything but platonic love? No, no. I’m actually pretty sure Rick is SAYING that homosexuals SHOULDN’T be LEGALLY allowed to feel anything but platonic love.



“If the Supreme Court says that you have the right to consensual [gay] sex within your home, then you have the right to bigamy, you have the right to polygamy, you have the right to incest, you have the right to adultery. You have the right to anything. Does that undermine the fabric of our society? I would argue yes, it does.”


Did I … Did I just call it in an earlier rebuttal? Did I just call out Rick and his want to basically make it ILLEGAL to be gay?



“The reason Social Security is in big trouble is we don’t have enough workers to support the retirees. Well, a third of all the young people in America are not in America today because of abortion.”


Lmao. Yes, Rick; the reason why Social Security is unable to help cover the finances of the retired is because of all the MERDERD BABBIES. NOT because the government has been STEALING the money to help fund their projects and the wars they are forcing us to go through, and then we have states with laws that make it illegal for 80-year-olds to drive, thus they can’t get a job, and if you don’t have a job, then you can’t pay for the bus or for your house, so they’re being FORCED to live in retirement homes. Right? Because the job market currently can’t support 17% of the U.S. population as it is, and YOU want to add those “50,000,000” BABBIES to that percentage.



“The idea that the Crusades and the fight of Christendom against Islam is somehow an aggression on our part is absolutely anti-historical.”


Anti-Historical says the guy to people who, again, have Google. He might as well say that Christians never partook in the Crusades. Hell, might as well say the Crusades never existed at all, lol.



“You can say I’m a hater. But I would argue I’m a lover. I’m a lover of traditional families and of the right of children to have a mother and father… I would argue that the future of America hangs in the balance, because the future of the family hangs in the balance. Isn’t that the ultimate homeland security, standing up and defending marriage?”


Implying that if you’re not married, period, and you have kids, then you are being a horrible parent and you’re providing a terrible life for your kids. Also implying that widowed mothers and widowed fathers, or relatives raising the children, are bad parents.

Also implying that same-sex marriage is the ONLY threat to the “future” of American families. Not, you know, the nearly 50% of all new marriages that end in divorce, divorce in itself, domestic violence between parents, child abuse, child neglect, PRO-MARRIAGE, lack of jobs, jobs that make parents practically absent from their kids’ lives, certain people HAVING kids, conflict in religious and political beliefs, conflict in how the money is spent, adultery, suicide, homicide, drug abuse, alcohol abuse, poor mental and/or physical health, etc.



“We have brave men and women who are willing to step forward because they know what’s at stake. They’re willing to sacrifice their lives for this great country. What I’m asking all of you tonight is not to put on a uniform. Put on a bumper sticker. Is it that much to ask? Is it that much to ask to step up and serve your country?” —Sen. Rick Santorum (R-PA), during his losing 2006 re-election bid, urging supporters to put a Rick Santorum bumper sticker on their cars”


This was, as you can tell by the year, back when Rick was trying to keep his seat in the Pennsylvanian Senate, which he ultimately lost by quite a margin. I just wanted you to see how PATHETIC this fucking idiot is.

“PPL R FIGHTING AN UNCONSTITUSHUNAL WAR 4 U RITE NOW. TEH LEEST U CULD DO IZ PUT A GAWDDAMMED RIK SANDTORUM STICKER ON UR CAR BUMPER!!11!!”

Except, you know, people weren’t putting Rick Santorum bumper stickers on their cars PROBABLY because … THEY WEREN’T FUCKING SUPPORTING YOU, RICK. Everyone KNOWS that when you put a sticker on your bumper, it MEANS you’re in support of something. To put such a sticker on your bumper means you’re telling everyone else on the highway that you support the shitstick that is YOU, Rick, and I don’t think these people wanted to risk being ran off the road because of it.



“All the people who live in the West Bank are Israelis, they’re not Palestinians. There is no ‘Palestinian’. This is Israeli land.”


History lesson: There is a strip of land located between the Mediterranean Sea and the Jordan River. That land is Israel. Inside Israel is a division called “West Bank”. West Bank is the location all Palestinian territories, also known as the State of Palestine after their declaration of independence from Israel in 1988. Israel and Palestine have been in an on-and-off civil war for centuries concerning, what else, religion. Israel is 77% Jewish and Palestine is 75% Muslim.

So what’s the point in the recent resurgent of this centuries-long Holy War? Because even though Palestine was declared as it’s own country, and is recognized as such by 2/3’s of the world, Israel still has government control over the Palestinian territories, specifically Jerusalem, Palestine’s declared capital. They are currently at war over Jerusalem because it is seen as the Holy Land in both religions; however, Islam teaches that Mohammad was born in the Jerusalem, whereas Judaism teaches that Jerusalem was the city promised to the Jewish people by their god when he freed them from slavery in Egypt.

Which means, Rick, that Palestine does, indeed, exist, and they’re royally pissed off that Israel is still exercising its government policy over them. Meaning, religious laws that appeal to the Jewish religion in Israel are also appealing to the 17% of Jews in Palestine while SEVERELY oppressing that said 75% of Muslims. And of course, when the United States is FUNDING the Israelite with taxpayer money and military weapons (including nukes), you have kind of have to expect that we’re seen just as much an enemy. (Lol, 9/11.)

Just because you, Rick, along with the United Nations, Israel, and the rest of the United States are part of the other 1/3 of the world that DOESN’T recognize Palestine as their own country, doesn’t mean it isn’t. They are, in every sense, their own damn country because it was agreed upon by Israel itself. By your damn logic, the United States’ original thirteen colonies still belong to England.



“The notion that college education is a cost-effective way to help poor, low-skill, unmarried mothers with high school diplomas or GEDs [US General Educational Development tests] move up the economic ladder is just wrong.” — from his book, It Takes a Family: Conservatism and the Common Good


There are so many things I going to assume what Rick was getting at with this hilarious misogynistic statement:

1) Implying that a college education is NOT a cost-effective way to help the poor, low-skilled, and those with just high school diplomas or GEDs - unmarried mothers excluded.

2) Implying that a college education is NOT a cost-effect way to help the poor, low-skilled, and those with just high school diplomas or GEDs ONLY if you’re an unmarried mother.

3) Implying women without children have a greater need for a college education in order to get a better paying job … than unmarried women with children to support.

4) Implying that a college education is pointless, unmarried mother or not, because if you’re not born into wealth and a white, male, Republican Christian, then you will never get anywhere in the business world.

Take your fucking pick, Rick.



“In far too many families with young children, both parents are working, when, if they really took an honest look at the budget, they might find they don’t both need to… What happened in America so that mothers and fathers who leave their children in the care of someone else — or worse yet, home alone after school between three and six in the afternoon — find themselves more affirmed by society? Here, we can thank the influence of radical feminism.”


Oh, fucking God, where do I start? I guess I’ll start with his claim that both parents don’t have to work.

The second I read that, I said to myself, “I bet myself ten bucks, before I go to Google, that Santorum’s personal income is WELL fifty times more than the income of the average working person. I bet that Santorum is, as usual, part of the 1% of the population that is the rich, white, Republican Christian families giving unwarranted, unhelpful financial advice to the poor and struggling working classes on how to budget and spend their money when they, themselves, don’t have to worry about THEIR spouses not working because they wouldn’t KNOW what it’s like to struggle financially.

Well, I Googled it.

After the federal income tax, Rick’s annual income (JUST his income mind you) was $660,000 in 2007; $1,100,000 in 2009; $923,000 in 2010.

My fiance just did the calculation:
Annual Federal Minimum Wage Income = ((52w * 36h)*$7.25)*.85 = $12,331.80

This is annual, minimum-wage income with no benefits and after income tax. Then we compared it to Santorum’s income in 2010.

Well, I lost my self-bet. I said he probably made fifty times more than minimum wage, right? I was wrong.

He makes fucking 75 times more than minimum wage.

I know, I know; “BUT MOUTHROT! HE’S DEFINITELY NOT AS BAD AS ROMNEY OR GINGRICH!”

True. But Romney and Gingrich also aren’t telling women that they have no need to work; that they shouldn’t be working; that they should be at home, being housewives, taking care of the house and kids, and shitting out more babies.

They’re also not referring to the Women’s Rights movements (which guaranteed all women the right to equality in higher education and the workforce, as well as the ability to vote and own property) as “radical feminism” and thus blaming female equality and freedom for the way our society’s kids are turning out. It DOES NOT take a genius (but apparently you have to be more intelligent than Rick in this case) to realize that women gaining the ability to own property was to help said women survive in society.

If you weren’t able to own property in your name (by “property”, it means a house, land and/or farmland, bank accounts, vehicles, business permits, etc.), then that means you had to rely on another to take care of you … FOR ALL OF YOUR LIFE.

Before the movements, women had to rely on their fathers and/or brothers to take care of them until they found a man to take over that responsibility. Except, as the U.S. was becoming more and more industrialized, and the responsibility of being the breadwinner was becoming more crucial for the survival of your family, because women couldn’t own property, if that said male breadwinner abandoned you, divorced you, disowned you, lost his job, or just died, then you were SHIT OUT OF LUCK unless you could find another breadwinner.

Women working today isn’t a form of “radical feminism”. It was inherently fucking important that women be able to work and provide for themselves on their own without the destructive dependence on just one person. MOST women don’t work for the “sake of working”. They work because they are taught to depend on themselves when they become adults, and when they’re married or unmarried and have children, they have no choice but to work, especially two or three jobs when the ONLY job options out there are minimum wage ones.

Wait, these mothers could just go to colleg— oh, that’s right, Rick. You declared in your damn book that college education DOES NOT help unmarried mothers despite the fact that, lol, IT FUCKING DOES.

So, let’s recap this quote:
1) Men should be the only ones working while women should be taking care of the family household/spousal household, all the while looking for a future husband/having and raising her husband’s children.

2) If you’re a woman, with or without children, and you’re working, then you are a product of “radical feminism” because you DARE show that you are a human being with productive capabilities, too.

3) If you’re a woman WITH children, single or married, and you’re working and/or pursuing a higher education in order to provide a better life for said family, then you are a horrible mother and you’re what’s wrong with families aside, aside from homosexuals wanting to marry and adopt.




With that said I am, for a fact, WHOLLY insulted that such an IGNORANT, out-of-touch loser would even THINK he could ever understand the importance of equality and freedom to have a valid opinion on it when BOTH were handed to him at birth and have had no history of them threatened by anyone.

What I just find hilarious, after all of this, is that Rick Santorum dropped out of the race because he’s clearly just an easily asshurt faggot.

Ignoring the fact that this should have been seen a mile away considering that he was already found to be a whiny bitch back when he was losing the re-election as a Pennsylvanian Senator in 2006, Santorum was ACTUALLY posing a threat to Mitt Romney with the Southern States … but the second a trend started showing that he was losing the Midwest States, he immediately drops out. Why? Fucking Newt Gingrich and Ron Paul are still in the race and they were further behind than him!

This is apparently what a good chunk of the south wanted, guys:
A man against homosexuality in every sense of the word.
A man against a woman’s right to work.
A man against abortion.
A man against college education for the poor class and the unmarried mothers.
And a man … who will throw in the towel the SECOND he sees that shit isn’t going his way.

Lol. Good job, America.

Getting Something Off My Chest

So, as you may already know, I was RottedStamps and Professor-MouthRot on deviantART. I was banned in late August for block-evading, but all I did was laugh because a week prior, I had already written a journal declaring I would be on hiatus as I was pretty much done making stamps.

Well, since then, it would seem that an embolden little Christfag is running around on the site, taking obvious advantage of the fact that I’ve been banned: LongLiveLink. (Notice, in her journals, that she’s one of those people who thinks she’s cool, but everyone knows she’s not cool?)

TWO months after I’ve been banned, she starts talking shit: [link] - Here, she has taken screencaps of a long-dead debate between a friend and I concerning those who whore for attention by posting pictures of their self-mutilation on deviantART.

Ignoring the fact that she looked like a fucking idiot, trying to claim that my fiance does not exist and then backtracking on a dime when another of my friends came in and told her that he does, indeed, exist and that we are, indeed, en fiance … she is reminded that I’m banned. Her response:

[link] - “!RottedStamps is banned; but TheStarsPrism isn’t … also !RottedStamps has some other accounts, so that’s why I said “come at me”

I’m sorry, lol … but does she seriously believe that’d be idiotic enough to just, you know, reply to her under a new name? I mean, did she just conveniently forget that I made journals showcasing thumbnails of images that violated deviantART’s rules? Which means I KNOW the rules concerning being banned? Clearly, though, she also thinks my friends are just as stupid as her, asking if my fiance and I have any other accounts. ([link])

Lol, of course we have other accounts, you stupid twat. Problem?

Of course, she’s part of Biblewhore Bus with SailorWolf4, Starlow-FTW, and Le-Zodiaque, all of which have confronted me on my “non-Christian” views at different times and each have had their asses handed to them, so it’s predictable when she sucks dick at any given time that one of them talks smack:

[link] - “Also, I’m GLAD they got banned! They trolled me once before! I can’t even remember on WHAT- but that kid”

Lol, she may not remember, but I do, and let me tell you something: If getting your ass handed to you, after you’ve taken upon yourself to leave an ignorant comment on someone ELSE’S deviation, is considered being “trolled”, then I am one of the best trolls around. However, because I’m actually intelligent and she’s not, I know what being “trolled” means and it isn’t what she “experienced”.

She made her existence known to me when she came onto my ICP stamp (“I’m Down with the Clown”), and said that while she’s never listened to ICP, she “knows” that “I’m a Juggalo” would have made “more sense” than “I’m Down with the Clown”.

I promptly told her that the phrase “I’m Down with the Clown” has been in multiple ICP songs and is a commonplace saying among the actual fans of ICP, and she would have known this if she HAD taken the time to listen to ICP or at least did a little fucking research (which she then claimed she did, and which I then promptly said she was lying because ICP actually has a song named “Down with the Clown”). Then I told her that she’s got some damn audacity, trying to tell someone what would make more “sense” on a subject that she’d just admitted she knew fucking NOTHING about.

So, no, she wasn’t trolled. She got schooled for her dumbfuckery.

I just find it hilarious that in spite of this “trolling” I did to her and her claims of this massive dislike for me ([link]; [link]; [link]; [link]; [link]), she still didn’t have a problem following me on Tumblr (http://longlivelink.tumblr.com/).

She can make up all these ridiculous, juvenile assumptions about me in response to her blatant asshurt (“Master of the Universe”? Are you for real, dumbass? Lol), but at the end of the day, at least I’m not an obvious coward, suddenly growing “balls” when the person I don’t like is no longer able to defend themselves as I start talking shit. She’s no different than those pussies who block you and then starts talking shit about you in a journal and/or deviation, hiding behind the fact that you can’t respond back.

Unlike this silly bitch, I’m not afraid to confront people, especially when they’re still around and capable of responding.

It must put her Jesus panties in a bunch, knowing that I’m still alive and active on deviantART and she doesn’t know who am I or where I am, or how many accounts I actually have, lol.

Anyway, I usually don’t resort to petty things like this, but after I saw her multiple times, hiding behind the fact that I’m banned as she acts tough and confrontational, I just had to call her on her bullshit.

(Side note: What type of faggot says “epic win” anymore? Especially on EVERYTHING that you like or what you feel justifies your idiocy? I don’t know how she could make her dick-sucking anymore obvious, to tell you the truth.

Seriously. It’s like she purchased a book on Internet Slang just yesterday and is using every word in it without even bothering to read their meanings, along with plastering Trollface on everything like he was a case of Herpes.

LongLiveLink is the definition of “Trying Too Hard”, especially considering that she’s one of those morons who thinks she can “troll the trolls”, but is too stupid to realize that she’s a hypocrite for even wanting to.)

Florida Passed New Law Allowing Mandated School Prayer

Or, as the Floridian legislators claim, “inspirational messages”.

http://floridaindependent.com/74203/charles-van-zant-school-prayer

The law allows schools, K-12, to force kids to undergo “inspiration messages” during school events and activities. The legislators want to claim that it isn’t fucking “school prayer”, that it doesn’t say anything in the provisions that claim such.

However, there’s no set provision to begin with. No restriction on what would constitute as a “inspirational message” - meaning it can be anything from spreading a hate speech against homosexuals, to it telling seven-year-olds that the Earth is only 6,000 years old, dinosaurs never existed, and you’re automatically going to Biblical Hell if you’re a girl.

Here’s what the House sponsor tried to say:

“We [changed] that because we thought that wouldn’t go again this year. We got the attorneys in the senate and house together and asked for language that would pass U.S. and Florida Constitutional muster. They came up with the words “inspirational message.”

…

I ran the bill as a First Amendment issue. in our constitutions, we’re guaranteed freedom of speech. We teach children to speak, and this gives them the opportunity to speak out in school. It doesn’t mix church and state. It’s really why we have free speech in this country, so people can bring forth these issues freely.

And the bill has no concern about what they talk about. They can talk about whatever they want. after all the billions and billions of dollars training teachers, and building school and buying buses and the billions we’ve put into classroom education, they should be able to say whatever they want to say.”


He wants to claim that it ISN’T mandated school prayer, except he later claimed that the reason why we have violence, unwed mothers, and overall disobedience is because of the “absence of prayer in school”. Allow me to embolden the parts where he makes it plain as day that he’s saying one thing, but really meaning another:

“All the opposition I got from this bill is from people afraid that someone might use the words Jesus Christ or might actually pray. Many called what we’re doing a euphemism for school prayer. i would make the point that school prayer was abolished by ignorant judges 50 years ago. And that 50 years is a history lesson in what happens to a society that removes prayer.

You can look at the many social ills in our country that have developed in those 50 years. Before we took out school prayer, the biggest problems in school were talking out of turn or chewing gum. Today, the problems are drug abuse, teen pregnancy, rape and assault. School problems speak for themselves. By allowing for inspirational messages, those problems will be addressed.”


Notice that he wants to claim that the problems we have today are not what we had fifty years ago because of his conclusion that schools had MANDATED school prayer … and the he then claims that the only way to fix the problems today is to allow “inspiration messages”.

That means talking about fucking Jesus. How stupid does this douchebag actually take me for?

Ignoring the fact that 50 years ago parents were also raising their kids and not letting videogames babysit for them, schools dealt with bullies much better than today, and we had stricter laws concerning minors possessing weapons and drugs, religious prayer also preached hate against Jews, homosexuals, and fucking BLACKS, and women were still not taken seriously. So, fifty years ago, it was an automatic exile from society and/or a death sentence if you were any of these.

Maybe if we had more than just fucking 3% of our tax dollars going to the ENTIRETY of our educational system, we wouldn’t have the crime and civil disobedience that we do now - just a fucking thought.

Then again, what do I fucking know? I’m just some female busy getting her degree in Web Design; I don’t know shit about law or the Constitution, or common sense and logic for that matter, right?

(Fucking side note: Since when did Florida start making it their goal to steal “The Asshole State” title from Texas?)