More Psychology Shit: Rape?

At first I thought I was taking it way too seriously, but my fiance said he heard the same thing I heard with this guy: He’s implying with his joke that if we lived in a society where everyone was gay but him, and humanity was dying, he said he would save it “one female at a time”.

He’s implying that he will rape lesbians and force them to get pregnant for the “betterment” of humanity.

Can Already Smell the Butthurt in Psychology Class

So, I’m in Distance Learning for my Psychology course this semester with my fiance. One of the requirements for doing this online is to participate in the “discussion forum topic” each week. This is week one, and I’m already causing some shit, lol.

I’m going to post the screencaps of others, but this guy was giving his opinion on “Abstinence” classes and I responded. I commend him on his effort to project his defensiveness onto me as if I was the one offended … but it doesn’t quite work when it’s obvious that he is the one offended when blew past my whole argument to him, and he nitpicked ONE thing I said in response to someone else.


While I first had sex when I was 21, your opinion is wholly unrealistic and clearly uneducated for even adults; not just teenagers. “100% preparation” doesn’t always end in 100% success considering that there is no fail-safe contraceptive unless you’re promoting abstinence and sterilization (and you can’t force someone to not have sex or to not reproduce) coupled with irregular menstrual cycles, poor to no income, reactions to the commonplace contraceptive, lack of proper sexual education, and/or unwilling sexual intercourse. I am currently 24 and engaged. By the logic you are trying to argue against teenagers having sex, my fiance and I should live in a sexless marriage because we currently don’t want children, and because contraceptives are not 100% fail-proof and I’m assuming you’re against abortion, there is that risk that I will get pregnant. We should also live in a sexless marriage on the OFF-CHANCE that one of us will cheat as well, thus bringing home an STD as condoms are also not 100% fail-proof against those either. So, in short, you are promoting this idea that people should only have sex when they’re ready to have kids. As for teenagers, instead of advocating a healthily-funded, mandatory Sex Education class that is taught by professionals in high schools, you would rather say, “TEENZ SHULDNT HAV SEX UNTIL STRANGERS SAY THEY CAN”, like ANY teenager is going to fucking listen. Most teenagers rebel against their own parents and yet you expect them to take lectures from strangers? Just like any adult, you can’t force a teenager to do or NOT do something. They have freewill, and it doesn’t take a brain surgeon to know that teenagers don’t like being treated like idiots when they know you’re trying to demonize something that is wholly natural and isn’t so taboo if it’s a constant on television, in magazines, on the Internet, in songs, and discussed with friends. Meaning, the intelligent ones can smell bullshit from five miles away, so if you’re not going to be forthright with them and explain to them the shit that Sex Ed USED to teach students before this Abstinence-Only crap, then they have no reason to listen to ANYTHING that you say, especially the real dangers of unprotected sex and one-night stands with strangers. Then again, if you’re too damn stupid to take the hint that if teenagers will drink, smoke, and do drugs for the same reasons, then how can I expect you take the same hint concerning sex? Your opinion attacks a symptom, not the disease; the disease is a lack of proper education on sex and the sense of shame that society deals any woman or man who dares to WANT to buy contraceptives. So not only are to condemning the majority of our youth by not providing them a proper education on sex and contraceptives, you’re also punishing the intelligence of the few that did their research anyway and want to buy contraceptives. So, congratulations - your dime-a-dozen ignorance on this topic is adding to the fucking problem, asshole.
View Separately

While I first had sex when I was 21, your opinion is wholly unrealistic and clearly uneducated for even adults; not just teenagers.

“100% preparation” doesn’t always end in 100% success considering that there is no fail-safe contraceptive unless you’re promoting abstinence and sterilization (and you can’t force someone to not have sex or to not reproduce) coupled with irregular menstrual cycles, poor to no income, reactions to the commonplace contraceptive, lack of proper sexual education, and/or unwilling sexual intercourse.

I am currently 24 and engaged. By the logic you are trying to argue against teenagers having sex, my fiance and I should live in a sexless marriage because we currently don’t want children, and because contraceptives are not 100% fail-proof and I’m assuming you’re against abortion, there is that risk that I will get pregnant. We should also live in a sexless marriage on the OFF-CHANCE that one of us will cheat as well, thus bringing home an STD as condoms are also not 100% fail-proof against those either.

So, in short, you are promoting this idea that people should only have sex when they’re ready to have kids. As for teenagers, instead of advocating a healthily-funded, mandatory Sex Education class that is taught by professionals in high schools, you would rather say, “TEENZ SHULDNT HAV SEX UNTIL STRANGERS SAY THEY CAN”, like ANY teenager is going to fucking listen. Most teenagers rebel against their own parents and yet you expect them to take lectures from strangers?

Just like any adult, you can’t force a teenager to do or NOT do something. They have freewill, and it doesn’t take a brain surgeon to know that teenagers don’t like being treated like idiots when they know you’re trying to demonize something that is wholly natural and isn’t so taboo if it’s a constant on television, in magazines, on the Internet, in songs, and discussed with friends. Meaning, the intelligent ones can smell bullshit from five miles away, so if you’re not going to be forthright with them and explain to them the shit that Sex Ed USED to teach students before this Abstinence-Only crap, then they have no reason to listen to ANYTHING that you say, especially the real dangers of unprotected sex and one-night stands with strangers.

Then again, if you’re too damn stupid to take the hint that if teenagers will drink, smoke, and do drugs for the same reasons, then how can I expect you take the same hint concerning sex?

Your opinion attacks a symptom, not the disease; the disease is a lack of proper education on sex and the sense of shame that society deals any woman or man who dares to WANT to buy contraceptives. So not only are to condemning the majority of our youth by not providing them a proper education on sex and contraceptives, you’re also punishing the intelligence of the few that did their research anyway and want to buy contraceptives.

So, congratulations - your dime-a-dozen ignorance on this topic is adding to the fucking problem, asshole.

(via the-unpopular-opinions-deactiva)

My Stance on Slut-Shaming

Ever since that police officer in Toronto who told college women that if they don’t want to be raped, then “they shouldn’t dress like sluts”, and then Rush Limbaugh accusing women of being “sluts” if they take birth control, the issue of slut-shaming has been active in conversations.

I’ve debated this with my fiance and I’ve come to realization that I heartily slut-shame, much more than he does, lol. I’m not talking about using words like “slut” and “whore” for the sake insulting, either.

Are you a woman who has sexual partners every night? Do you enjoy orgies or gang-bangs? Are you a stripper? An actress in porn films? I’m all right with this. That is your freedom and your right.

Are you constantly partying and getting smashed, then waking up naked and with dried cum on your face and in your hair?

Do you cry rape after you’ve woken up, naked and next to a guy, from a hard night of partying?

Are you a chronic cheater - in an exclusive relationship that is BELIEVED to be exclusive by your partner?

Do you sleep with married or otherwise taken men/women when you know about their current relationship?

Do you have children every time you go out and have sex or bring men/women home?

Are you always having unprotected sex?

Are a woman and shitting out a kid for every dozen sexual encounters?

Are a woman with two or more kids and you don’t know the father of either, but you keep having sex with random people?

Are you a woman with two or more kids that you CLAIM you know who the father(s) is/are, and it’s found out that they’re not?

Are you constantly contracting sexual diseases?

Are you using abortion as a method of birth control because you can’t afford $0.50 a condom or just don’t “like how they feel”?

THEN YOU’RE A FUCKING SLUT

.

Having sex is not the problem - the lack of responsibility and lack of mutual respect is. I don’t care if you’re thirteen and have had sex with fourteen separate bed partners at different times during the day on your birthday; I don’t care if you’re married and you and your partner are into swinging.

I do care, however, if your sex life poses a health risk to other people, brings unwanted children into the world, is purposely meant to break up relationships for selfish reasons, emotionally scars and destroys the trust of your current partner, and/or abortion is the preferred method of birth control.

I know - “BUT MOUTHROT, WHY DO YOU CARE WHAT OTHER PEOPLE DO? IT’S NOT ANY OF YOUR BUSINESS! WHAT ABOUT MEN?”

I care because these idiots make it a point for me to know about their irresponsible actions by either boasting about it (like those idiots who tell anyone who will listen every time they’ve had a single drop of liquor), defending themselves against posts like mine, or when they go on national television (Lol, Maury Show).

Men are just as fucking bad when it comes to this, especially the ones who have fifteen children floating around, all from different women, because they can’t wrap it. In fact, I think they’re worse in this case - at least with women, you can’ gett pregnant if you’re already pregnant, so that’s at least a nine-month halt when it comes to childbearing. With men, the only restriction THEY have is the women who are willing to sleep with them. You can’t impregnate a woman if there’s not a woman to impregnate. In cases of rape, unless you can’t catch him, rapists can be locked up for nearly thirty years.

Laws that tell you what you can and cannot do with your life are wholly illegal and unconstitutional; however, I am perfectly within my right to judge you for the shit you do, for how you look, how you treat others, ect.

Your sex life is no different.

Just as it’s your prerogative to tell me and/or the public about your destructive sex life, making it a point for it to BE everyone’s business to know, it’s also my prerogative to deem you a nasty little whore because of it.

Don’t like it? Then keep it private like it’s supposed to be. Otherwise, don’t bitch because not everyone respects you for what you do.

the-unpopular-opinions: http://katara.tumblr.com/ Apparently I’m going to have to explain this because the people in the comments are too damn stupid to realize that when people compare homosexuality to incest, they are NOT comparing the sexual acts, but if you want to get right down to it, incest does contain homosexuality and vice verse. They are comparing the similiar lack of understanding, misinformation, society not being accepting, religious and political officials promoting laws against it, and people saying it’s “wrong”; all because THEY’RE not into it or because they THINK it’s “gross”; because THEY don’t “approve” it should be illegal. And as usual, I’m seeing the the same idiots that I just listed: “The difference is that there’s nothing the fucking matter with homosexuality and incest is fucking disgusting” Open heart surgery is disgusting, too. That mean we should ban it? Fucking of course not. You because you don’t like it doesn’t mean other people have to not like it. “As long as they don’t reproduce in incest, idgaf who anyone wants to have sex with.” Same logic is being applied to homosexuals right now: “I don’t care if you’re gay, just so long as you don’t get married.” “Do you want to get it in with daddy?” Yes, because that’s brilliant logic right there. If you support something, then you MUST be participating in it. I support equal rights for homosexuals and, the last I checked, I’m not gay. Didn’t realize this was so hard to comprehend.
View Separately

the-unpopular-opinions:

http://katara.tumblr.com/

Apparently I’m going to have to explain this because the people in the comments are too damn stupid to realize that when people compare homosexuality to incest, they are NOT comparing the sexual acts, but if you want to get right down to it, incest does contain homosexuality and vice verse.

They are comparing the similiar lack of understanding, misinformation, society not being accepting, religious and political officials promoting laws against it, and people saying it’s “wrong”; all because THEY’RE not into it or because they THINK it’s “gross”; because THEY don’t “approve” it should be illegal.

And as usual, I’m seeing the the same idiots that I just listed:

“The difference is that there’s nothing the fucking matter with homosexuality and incest is fucking disgusting”

Open heart surgery is disgusting, too. That mean we should ban it? Fucking of course not. You because you don’t like it doesn’t mean other people have to not like it.

“As long as they don’t reproduce in incest, idgaf who anyone wants to have sex with.”

Same logic is being applied to homosexuals right now: “I don’t care if you’re gay, just so long as you don’t get married.”

“Do you want to get it in with daddy?”

Yes, because that’s brilliant logic right there. If you support something, then you MUST be participating in it. I support equal rights for homosexuals and, the last I checked, I’m not gay.

Didn’t realize this was so hard to comprehend.

(via the-unpopular-opinions-deactiva)

STAY OUT. OF MY. FUCKING UTERUS.

So, let’s get you fuckers up to date on the psychotic, anti-woman bills that have been proposed and/or passed concerning a woman’s ability to choice concerning her fetus in different states:

- On a federal level, insurance companies are no longer allowed to make abortion affordable and they’ve jacked up the price to make is as expensive as birth despite the fact that an abortion is a walk-in while childbirth requires extensive care and monitoring over you and your child during and after your pregnancy.

- On a federal level, Sex Education classes have been replaced by Abstinence-Only classes because Christfags think their children are being told that sex is great, being forced to watch pornography, being told to have as much sex as possible, and that they’re being taught how to HAVE sex and how to pleasure their partner, whereas IN REALITY, they’re being told that they should wait until they’re emotionally ready, but if they still decide to do it, they’re educated to the best of the school’s ability on how to use birth control and contraceptives, the anatomy of the genitals, the realistic dangers and consequences of having unprotected sex.

In comparison, Abstinence-Only classes teach that all contraception fails so it’s a waste of money, you will almost always get a disease, and that you shouldn’t have sex until you’re an adult and married. However, if you’re actually intelligent, like me, what happens when you tell fucking TEENAGERS that they CAN’T do something, and they have the ability to research sex on the Internet? THEY’RE GOING TO FUCKING DO IT. What happens when the more reasonable teenagers know that the things they’re “taught” in Abstinence-Only class are a load of bullshit and go out and buy condoms anyway? THEY DON’T KNOW HOW TO USE THEM PROPERLY because they were never taught.

- On a federal level, Christfags and the economically-retarded want to make it illegal to allow women to have cheap and even free birth control because they don’t want their “premiums” going up or their “tax dollars” paying for a woman’s “slutty tendencies”, even though most of these dipshits don’t know that females have the most complex, easily altered hormone system due to normal AND complicated menstrual cycles, so birth control is widely used to help curve the pain and discomfort of periods, as well as prevent actual cancers and life-threatening diseases. NOT JUST TO PREVENT PREGNANCY.

However, these SAME Christfags and economically-retarded people are okay that condoms can be picked up for free at a clinic, and their “premiums” go up and their “tax dollars” pay for cheap and even free Viagra which is NOT a contraceptive and PROMOTES “slutty tendencies” in MEN. Do you see the fucking problem yet?

- On a federal level, a proposed bill will allow doctors to legally “omit” important fetal information from the mother, including complications in fetal growth, progressive signs of disfigurement, and warning signs that the baby will have some form of mental retardation, including Down’s Syndrome or Autism, just so the mother will not have the ability to choose whether or not to abort the sick fetus. So, not only are they LYING to the mother and taking away her freedom of choice, but they are also now forcing her to endure the financial and parental difficulties of raising a permanently sick child all because of these fucking Christfag views. Good job, cuntbags - after all, why do you care? You don’t have to deal with the hardship of raising a sick and disabled child, so it shouldn’t bother you, right? Right.

- In Texas, doctors are required to LIE to their patients that abortion has a high risk of future breast cancer, force a woman endure a sonogram, and then force them to listen to the fetal heartbeat and the description the doctor tells about the fetus.

- In Virginia and Pennsylvania, a Trans-Vaginal Ultrasound is required to get an abortion. Trans-Vaginal Ultrasound is the answer to Texas’ Sonogram law when you’ve caught your pregnancy early. So, not only are you being punished for having sex, but you’re also being punished for catching your pregnancy between the first 12 weeks, and you have to be painfully probed in your vagina for the sake of trying to sway you into NOT getting the abortion.

Because the abortion is not affordable anymore, Christfags are hoping that if being raped by the state doesn’t stop you, the cost of not only shelling out a couple grand for the abortion procedure but also paying for a STATE-MANDATED Trans-Vaginal Ultrasound that provides NO relevant information concerning an abortion should make it so expensive that you COULDN’T get an abortion, even if you still wanted one.

- In Alaska, a proposed bill would REQUIRE women to get “written consent” from the father of her fetus in order to get an abortion, which also means the father of the fetus could also decide to FORCE a woman to get an abortion even if SHE didn’t want one. I don’t like to pull the “rape/incest” excuse because even though it’s ABHORRENT to deny a raped woman the ability to abort her rape-fetus seeing as she didn’t have a choice in the conception to begin with, but I know there are more pressing and commonplace scenarios that are just as life-fucking for women when it comes to this ridiculously stupid anti-abortion law: What if the father of the fetus was absent or ended up absent after denying the mother consent to abortion or after the birth? What if the father of the fetus was unfaithful or a deadbeat? What if the father of the fetus was abusive? What if the father of the fetus DIED? What if the father of the fetus was spiteful and denied the woman consent and then left her? Then again, I’m asking logical questions for the idiots who thought this bill would be a good idea, which alludes to this idea that either they’re too stupid to ask these questions themselves, or they just don’t give a shit.

- In Ohio, they have the “Heartbeat Bill”, which basically bans abortion except when the woman has endured life-threatening complications - not IF, but WHEN. It claims that if the doctor can detect a fetal heartbeat, then the woman can’t get an abortion. The kicker? Fetal heartbeats can be detected at the first five to six weeks of pregnancy, and most women won’t know they’re pregnant until the second to third month.

So, I know you’re asking me, “MouthRot! What radical, uneducated anti-abortion bill is being proposed today?”

And I’ll have to say, “Well, bitch, with the help of the my political soulmate, Dametora, I’ve learned that in Arizona, legislators are proposing a new bill that will surpass the already faillogic of “life starts at conception” with “life starts BEFORE conception”!”

That’s right, fuckers, Arizona is voting on a new bill that will ban abortion TWO WEEKS before a woman ever has sex.

A new bill up for vote in the state of Arizona would ban abortions for some expectant mothers, but that’s only the start of what lawmakers have in store. If the legislation passes, the state will consider a child to exist even before conception.

Under Arizona’s H.B. 2036, the state would recognize the start of the unborn child’s life to be the first day of its mother’s last menstrual period. The legislation is being proposed so that lawmakers can outlaw abortions on fetuses past the age of 20-weeks, but the verbiage its authors use to construct a time cycle for the baby would mean that the start of the child’s life could very well occur up to two weeks before the mother and father even ponder procreating.


I know what you’re thinking - “But MouthRot, that sounds so stupid! “That’s like saying you’ve made a painting before you bought the canvas!” What would be the point of this bill? Most women don’t know even they’re pregnant until one to three months into the pregnancy, and there are already a lot of laws that make it illegal to get an abortion within the first five weeks!”

Well, this bill is simply meant to make it illegal to use FUCKING Plan B/Morning After pill of course! Not even that, it WILL be pushed to later BAN ALL female birth control.

How fucking DARE these out-of-touch, no-life, misogynistic COWARDS. This IS a ban on abortion, but these men just lack the spine and testicles to just outright say, “Abortion, in ever sense of the word, is illegal.”

Instead, they have to be little snakes about it, sneaking around and putting up “roadblocks”, thinking women are too fucking stupid to know what the hell they’re actually doing.

Under this bill, you will NEVER be able to abort a fetus, whether it be over-the-counter or in the doctor’s office. Under this bill, it is basically illegal to have sex if you have a twat and the ability to get pregnant. You already can’t afford birth control, you already have the rely on your man to use a condom even though he was never taught how to use it properly due to Abstinence-Only classes, and now you can’t have an abortion WHEN (NOT if) you get pregnant, not even with the Morning After pill.

But you know what pisses me off the most? This quote from the MALE douchebag, Senator Steve Smith, who is approving this piece of atrocity:

“I would like to listen to the 50 million-plus children that have been aborted and killed since Roe v. Wade. I would like to listen to what they think of this bill.”


You know what I would like, Mr. Smith? I would like you to listen to all of the women who HAVE died, COULD have died, and WILL die because of oppressive, unnecessary, and unreasonable bills like yours. I want you to listen to all of the children who were TOSSED into the fucking foster care system because FORCING women to give birth does NOT magically change their mind in the fact that they DIDN’T want that child. I want you to listen to these children as they tell you about how they’ve lived their entire lives in the foster care system and have most likely been neglected, abused, and raped, and yet you want to force women to give birth to more children that will just end up like them. I want you to get an actual fucking education and learn that “fetus” does not “baby”, which means no one “killed” 50-million “babies”.

None of these people deserve to be in the position of power that they’re in; they need to be in fucking mental asylums. They are the fucking “moral police”, and that’s it. Their morals are the only right morals, even though the laws they want to pass will NEVER pertain to them and are usually brought on by religious bias, therefore it goes strictly against the Constitution.

I am disgusted.